The Anti-Gun Debate

The Anti-Gun Debate The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is hard for most people to grasp and understand without getting their tails in a knot. Thanks to several mass shootings at home and abroad, the anti-gun crowd (i.e. the Obamas and Clintons of the world) never let a crisis go to waste. As soon as some nut job or terrorist decides to make a name for themselves by gunning down unarmed civilians in a school, theater, nightclub or any other "gun free zone" in America the liberals jump on their soap boxes or start writing articles explaining to us all why we must give up our right to keep and bear arms... Read more (PDF). How SHOULD our "right to keep and bear arms" be interpreted? The goal of the following analytical essay will be to break it down, piece by piece, in order to put all argument and debate over its intended meaning to rest... Read more (PDF). Another option would be to replace the 2nd Amendment with a much better option... An UPDATED Second Amendment (PDF). Probably the best SCOTUS opinion based on the Second Amendment thus far has been District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) where Justice Scalia explained it in detail... Read more. A good review covering this topic, including a link to the MCDONALD v. CHICAGO decision, is also worth reading... Read more. Now that we have that part sorted out, here are some of my impressions about actually owning and operating a few different firearms... Read more (PDF). And the following links will give you some idea about what I think of Marxist Libtard Demoncraps (who trample on people's "rights") running the U.S.A. vs. Republicans, et al... The MLD New World Order (1) (PDF). The MLD New World Order (2) (PDF). A great read (PDF). More great reads (PDF).